How we rank
Every ranking on CourseShortlist rests on the inputs described here: what gets measured, which pages it is read from, how often it is rechecked, and what we refuse to score on. Written so you can audit the result rather than take our word for it.
Last updated October 13, 2026
A verdict without its working is just somebody's taste. This page lays out how each ranking on CourseShortlist is assembled: the figures that count, the pages each one is read from, the rhythm of rechecking, and the rules that hold no matter what a platform would prefer. Find a recommendation you cannot trace back to something on this page and you have found a fault in our process, so tell us.
What goes into a ranking
The order rests on things that can be measured, weighted in the sequence below. Each platform also gets a score out of 5. That score is our editorial verdict built on these inputs. It is not a user rating and not a lab result. The ranking itself is the claim we stand behind; how much daylight sits between two neighbours is a judgement, and the review spells it out.
- Outside measurements first. When an independent party has measured what matters, that measurement leads. For learning platforms that means independent reviewers with published results and what they publish, never the learner counts and completion figures a platform quotes about itself.
- The entry price, and what follows it. We show the price a new customer pays to start, labelled with its term where it is an introductory price. Where the platform publishes a renewal price, it sits next to it. That series is kept in the Price Index, a benchmark we compile ourselves.
- What the catalogue actually holds. How broad and how good the courses are, judged against what someone trying to learn a skill genuinely needs, rather than a feature grid stuffed with items nobody opens.
- When free is enough. If auditing a course at no cost, or a free tier, gets most learners where they want to go, we say so in plain words.
The principles we hold to
None of these is a slogan. Each is a constraint built into the way the rankings get produced.
- Compared on merit. Platforms are set against each other on how well they teach, what the catalog holds, and what a subscription costs. No ranking here is paid for.
- Certificates weighed. Per platform we say which certificates carry weight with an employer and which amount to a downloadable PDF.
- Free options named. A lot of excellent teaching costs nothing. Where auditing a course for free gets you there, we say so, whether or not that suits us.
- Rechecked on a schedule. Course libraries grow and subscription prices shift, so every price is read again at its source each week.
How fresh the data is
Nothing loses a careful reader faster than a subscription price that is a year old, so freshness is a weekly routine rather than a promise. Every week each price is read again on the platform's own pricing page, from a US-based connection. For two platforms the price shown comes from their US App Store listing, and the plan name marks it as an in-app price. A confirmed price gets a new date. A changed price is only applied after two independent readings and a manual check. Each platform's page shows the date of its last price check for up to 14 days after that check. Once a month the whole set is measured again for the Price Index. That measurement is archived only when enough platforms could be verified, and a month-on-month trend appears only when two archived months cover the same platforms. That monthly record is what almost nobody else in this space publishes, and it is why this site is built to be cited rather than to go asking for links. Every data page offers a machine-readable feed that carries the measurement date, so the claim can be checked.
What we deliberately do not do
- No platform can pay to move up this list, and no position on it has ever been sold.
- Feelings, brand loyalty and the look of a logo do not move anything. Without data to point at, the order stays where it is.
- The renewal price, the small print and the cheaper alternative are never hidden to make a commission.
- No score is passed off as something else. The score out of 5 is our editorial verdict, not a user rating and not a lab result.
Where the money comes from, and why it cannot tilt the order
CourseShortlist costs nothing to use. The links on this site are plain links, and the order is decided on the inputs above, not on what a platform might pay.
Should we join a partner programme at some point, this page will say so. The ranking would still be built from the inputs above, with commission left out of the calculation. The full terms are in our disclaimer, and who runs the site is on our about page.
Hold us to it
Publishing a method only makes sense if the result can be checked against it. A ranking here that contradicts the data, or a subscription price that has gone stale, is a defect we want reported. The underlying numbers are exposed on purpose: the Price Index comes with a machine-readable feed, free to use under a CC BY 4.0 licence, so people and AI engines alike can verify the figures and reuse them with attribution.
How these pages are made
We draft text with the help of AI tools. Our editorial team checks it before it goes live. Every price is read from the platform's own pricing page or its App Store listing, and each platform's page shows the date of that check for up to 14 days. If something no longer matches what the platform says, write to info@courseshortlist.com and we will correct it.